WASHINGTON — Every idiosyncratic who appeared successful tribunal Monday arsenic a prospective juror successful the first Jan. 6 trial knew thing astir the Capitol attack, if lone that it happened. But that wasn’t capable to get them sent home. Instead, the justice and the lawyers spent hours painstakingly parsing precisely what they knew, wherever they got their accusation from, and however powerfully they felt astir it.
By the extremity of the day, 25 radical had made it done the archetypal circular of questioning to perchance service arsenic a juror successful the lawsuit of Guy Reffitt. The Wylie, Texas, antheral is facing a five-count indictment, including charges that helium brought a firearm and a handgun to Washington with the volition of supporting a “civil disorder” and that helium brought the second with him to the Capitol.
Judges truthful acold person rejected efforts by a tiny fig of defendants charged with storming the Capitol, including Reffitt, to determination trials retired of Washington, DC. In lodging attacks connected the location, defence attorneys person cited the city’s precocious percent of registered Democrats, the aggravated level of media coverage, and a brace of caller surveys that attempted to quantify the proportionality of residents who already person beardown antagonistic opinions astir radical arrested successful transportation with Jan. 6.
While immoderate prospective jurors were struck connected Monday aft telling the justice that they couldn’t acceptable speech the beardown opinions they had astir Jan. 6, much than fractional of the 34 radical questioned went guardant without an archetypal objection.
US District Judge Dabney Friedrich noted astatine the commencement of the time that Reffitt’s lawsuit was antithetic successful that the excavation of imaginable jurors apt would cognize astir the underlying events. The “critical qu...